[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 1 (Health Law Journal 2023) ::
HLJ 2023, 1(1): 1-16 Back to browse issues page
A Comparative Study on Cryonics Technology with a Focus on the Judicial Procedure of the United States, Canada and France: Challenges and Solutions
Emad Haghverdi1 , Seyed Reza Ehsanpour *1
1- Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (279 Views)
Background and Aim: Cryonics is an emerging phenomenon in the field of biotechnology, where the body or brain of a person suffering from an incurable disease is frozen with the hope that in the future when the treatment of his disease becomes possible; he will be brought back to life. This technology has created legal challenges that need to be investigated.
The only way to legitimise cryonics according to Iranian law is to accept cryonics as the only available treatment solution for terminally ill people on the verge of certain death.
Methods: In this research, we intend to analyse the approach of the judicial systems of the United States, Canada and France with a descriptive and analytical approach in facing the request for the issuance of a cryonics implementation license by individuals and provide suitable solutions to adapt them to the laws and regulations of Iran.
Ethical Considerations: Despite the lack of sufficient internal resources, the authenticity of the texts has been observed with honesty and integrity.
Results: The judiciary of the mentioned countries, because there is no necessary technology to revive cryonic patients, considers the cryonic patient as a dead person and only accepts cryonics as one of the ways of burying the body. Due to Shari'a rulings regarding the necessity of equipping and burying the corpse and the laws regarding the desecration of the dead, it is not possible to perform cryonics in the mentioned manner in Iran.
Conclusion: The only way to legitimize cryonics according to Iranian law is to accept cryonics as the only available treatment solution for terminally ill people on the verge of certain death.
Keywords: Cryonics, Comparative Law, Human Freezing, Judicial Procedure
Full-Text [PDF 503 kb]   (223 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article |
Received: 2023/08/16 | Accepted: 2023/12/7 | Published: 2024/02/4
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Haghverdi E, Ehsanpour S R. A Comparative Study on Cryonics Technology with a Focus on the Judicial Procedure of the United States, Canada and France: Challenges and Solutions. HLJ 2023; 1 (1) :1-16
URL: http://healthlawjournal.ir/article-1-41-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 1 (Health Law Journal 2023) Back to browse issues page
مجله حقوق سلامت Health Law Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 34 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710